Supreme court decisions today with votes11/26/2023 ![]() “This ruling is a complete victory for our democratic system and makes clear that state legislatures cannot ignore or defy state law when regulating federal elections,” said Jessica Ring Amunson and Sam Hirsch, partners at the law firm Jenner & Block who represented one of the voter advocacy groups involved in the case. The court’s ruling was praised by a large swath of voting rights attorneys, including the lawyers who represented the voters who had challenged the North Carolina redistricting map and who opposed the independent state legislature theory in court. Ruling cheered by voting rights attorneys Thomas wrote that he “fear” that the framework put forward by the majority “will have the effect of investing potentially large swaths of state constitutional law with the character of a federal question not amenable to meaningful or principled adjudication by federal courts.” ![]() Thomas accused the majority opinion of opening “a new field for Bush-style controversies over state election law – and a far more uncertain one” – an allusion to the blockbuster election disputes that arose in the 2000 presidential race. Supreme Court clarifies when online harassment can be prosecuted ![]() Supreme Court is seen Tuesday, May 16, 2023, in Washington. In a section joined only by Gorsuch, Thomas went on to criticize the merits of the majority’s opinion Tuesday. “It follows that no live controversy remains before this Court.” “In short, this case is over, and petitioners won,” Thomas wrote, referring to how a newly-reconstituted North Carolina Supreme Court reheard the case this year and reversed its decision in favor of the defenders of the Republican-drawn map. Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a dissent, joined in full by Justice Neil Gorsuch and in part by Justice Samuel Alito, arguing that the court should have dismissed the case as moot, given how circumstances around the case evolved after the justices heard it. “Today’s ruling affirms the crucial role state courts play in overseeing federal elections.” “As we argued to the Supreme Court, the independent state legislature theory was contrary to precedent and would have called into question hundreds of state constitutional provisions and decisions,” said former Acting US Solicitor General Neal Katyal, who represented Common Cause, one of the voting rights groups that challenged the Republican-drawn map. With the US Supreme Court rejecting the lawmakers’ theory that state courts could not police federal election rules, lawyers for the legislature’s opponents celebrated Tuesday’s ruling. In April, the newly composed North Carolina Supreme Court reversed its earlier decision and held that the state Constitution gives states courts no role to play in policing partisan gerrymandering. Harper, was argued at the Supreme Court, and before the justices could render an opinion, new developments occurred in North Carolina.Īfter the last election, the North Carolina Supreme Court flipped its majority to Republican. The justices heard oral arguments in the case last winter and some of them appeared to express some support for a version of the doctrine.īut after the case, known as Moore v. Here's what's left for the Supreme Court's final week of the term Justices of the US Supreme Court pose for their official photo at the Supreme Court in Washington, DC on October 7, 2022. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |